Deleski v. Raymark Industries, Inc.

I join the majority opinion so far as it goes. Plaintiff contends in part that, when *382she filed her complaint in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, she had no way of anticipating this Court’s holding in Ross v. Johns-Manville Corp., 766 F.2d 823 (3d Cir.1985), and that this surprise makes it in the interest of justice to transfer her case to New Jersey. The majority has,rejected this contention by showing that plaintiff has no right to claim surprise. I agree with its result and reasoning on that issue.

In my view, however the majority does not deal adequately with Deleski’s contentions (1)…