Legal Opinion

Jarzabek v. Tucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1989No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs "Dram Shop” cause of action (see, General Obligations Law § 11-101). "A defendant moving for summary judgment has the initial burden of coming forward with admissible evidence * * * reciting the material facts and showing that the cause of action has no merit” (GTF Mktg. v Colonial Aluminum Sales, 66 NY2d 965, 967). That burden was not met by defendant. On the crucial issue whether defendant sold, delivered or gave away…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. GTF Marketing, Inc. v. Colonial Aluminum Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cole v. O'Tooles of Utica, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Costa v. 1648 Second Avenue Restaurant Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Ryan v. Big Z Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. McGovern v. 4299 Katonah Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Jarzabek v. TucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API