Jarzabek v. Tucci
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs "Dram Shop” cause of action (see, General Obligations Law § 11-101). "A defendant moving for summary judgment has the initial burden of coming forward with admissible evidence * * * reciting the material facts and showing that the cause of action has no merit” (GTF Mktg. v Colonial Aluminum Sales, 66 NY2d 965, 967). That burden was not met by defendant. On the crucial issue whether defendant sold, delivered or gave away…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- GTF Marketing, Inc. v. Colonial Aluminum Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cole v. O'Tooles of Utica, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Costa v. 1648 Second Avenue Restaurant Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Ryan v. Big Z Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- McGovern v. 4299 Katonah Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Jarzabek v. TucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989