Legal Opinion

Monsanto Chemical Company v. Thornbrough

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 1, 1958No. 5-1575PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

The question in this case is whether 232 employees of the appellant were entitled to receive unemployment compensation during the latter part of a strike, after the appellant, by using supervisory employees, had resumed production at its plant. The Board of Review, whose decision was affirmed by the circuit court, held that the applicants were eligible for benefits. By this appeal Monsanto asks us to reverse that decision and to direct that the payment of these benefits not be charged to its account. See Call v. Luten, 219 Ark. 640, 244 S. W. 2d 130.

Several weeks after the expiration of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sakrison v. PierceArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Producers Produce Co. v. Industrial Commission of Missouri Division of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Robert S. Abbott Publishing Co. v. AnnunzioIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Saunders v. Maryland Unemployment Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  5. Ablondi v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Inter-Island Resorts, Ltd. v. AkahaneHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Cook v. BevillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. Locke v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Cumberland and Allegheny Gas Company v. HatcherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Continental Oil Co. v. Board of Labor AppealsMontana Supreme Court · 1978

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API