Stratton Massachusetts Gold Mines Co. v. Davis
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtDe Courcy, J.
This action of tort is brought in the name of a Colorado corporation to recover damages for alleged wrongful acts, hereinafter stated. In at least three of the six counts the defendants are described as de facto directors or officers. At the date of the writ all but one of the original twenty-four were in fact *550stockholders, and that one had been counsel for the plaintiff in the earlier action against Nathaniel A. Stratton. Answers in abatement were duly filed by most of the defendants, setting up (among other matters) that “this action is brought without the authority, direction or consent of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Merchants' National Bank v. Citizens' Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Mining Co. v. Anglo-Californian BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Moses v. TompkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Clark v. Inhabitants of EastonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Estate of Moulton v. PuopoloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- In re Bankers TrustCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Lazenby v. HendersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Angier CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
- Irwin v. Worcester Paper Box Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.