Legal Opinion

ANGROS v. DUDEK

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 23, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01058Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THOMAS EDMUND ANGROS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. 24-1058 v. ) ) FRANK BISIGNANO,1 ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) Defendant, ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the court is an appeal from the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “defendant”) denying the claim of Thomas Edmund Angros (“plaintiff”) for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (“SSA”),

42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). Plaintiff contends the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Joyce A. Rutherford v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Evelyn Plummer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API