Legal Opinion

In re Proving the last Will & Testament of Leland

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 15, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Proceeding upon the probate of a will.

1Opinion of the Court

Fowler, S.—

The will of Francis L. Leland is not contested ' and a decree for its probate has duly passed. This is an independent application for letters testamentary based on the probate. Where the right to receive letters testamentary is controverted the issue is thereafter carried on as a proceeding separate and apart from the probate proceeding, which is then confined to factum only. This division of a proceeding for probate and letters into two parts is a mere matter of practice for the convenience of the parties and the court. (Matter of Mayer, 84 Misc. Rep. 9.) The gravity of the issue…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hartnett v. . WandellNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Dox v. BackenstoseNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  3. Burweel v. ShawNew York Surrogate's Court · 1853
  4. In re MayerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1914
  5. In re the Estate of LelandNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Proving the Will of LelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. In re the Estate of CanterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. In re the Estate of GriffinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
  4. In re Proving the Will of LelandNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API