Legal Opinion

Gilson v. F. S. Royster Guano Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 22, 1924No. 3107Published

1Opinion of the Court

McKEEHAN, District Judge.

The F. S. Royster Guano Company recovered a judgment in the court below for $37,318.83, against the Farmers’ Supply & Product Company, as damages for the defendant’s breach of a contract to sell the plaintiff its entire production of garbage tankage. The defendant having passed into the hands of a receiver, the latter was made a defendant, and prosecutes this writ of error, the assignments raising three questions.

It is urged that the plaintiff was itself in default under the contract, in that it failed to pay for the initial shipment; but we think that the payment to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
  2. Campfield v. SauerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  3. Hirsch v. Georgia Iron & Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  4. Bostwick v. WillettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API