Legal Opinion

In re Rupp

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 1, 1870PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

SHERMAN, District Judge.

This case comes up on exceptions to the register’s report Two questions are raised:

First. Was Samuel W. Rupp a partner in the firm of George W. Rupp & Co.? The testimony fully establishes the fact that he was a partner.

Second. Is George W. Rupp, the other partner, entitled to claim out of the partnership funds the exemption of three hundred dollars allowed by the laws of Ohio, in lieu of a -homestead? This question has heretofore been before me, and I have decided it in the negative on the ground that partnership funds are in the nature of trust funds, and are not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Radcliff v. WoodNew York Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re CampDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1899
  2. Hart v. HiattCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API