Legal Opinion

Mueller v. Sangamo Construction Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1975No. 47006PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Underwood

The principal issue in this case is whether all of the evidence, when viewed in its aspect most favorable to plaintiffs Robert L. Mueller, administrator of the estate of Willard H. Maberry, and Betty L. Maberry, his widow, so overwhelmingly favors the defendant, Sangamo Construction Co., that a verdict for plaintiffs can never stand. (Pedrick v. Peoria and Eastern R.R. Co., 37 Ill.2d 494, 510.) A subsidiary issue is whether an absence of due care on decedent’s part precludes recovery by his widow of funeral expenses. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 68, par. 15.

Plaintiffs filed in the circuit court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Saunders v. SchultzIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Ross v. CuthbertOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Carter v. WinterIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Dudley v. PhillipsTennessee Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burke v. 12 Rothschild's Liquor Mart, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Coney v. J. L. G. Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Long v. City of New BostonIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Albaugh v. CooleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Huston v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API