Legal Opinion

United States v. Two Cases of Sulpho-Napthol

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 28, 1914Published

Proceedings by the United States for the condemnation of two cases, of sulpho-napthol by the Sulpho-Napthol Company,

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, District Judge.

In this case the government asks the condemnation of two cases of insecticide. They were seized under section 10 of the Insecticide Act of April 26, 1910 (36 Stat. 334, c. 191 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1911, p. 1373]). Their contents were labeled “Sulpho-Napthol,” “Inert Substance Water 7%, Insecticide 93%.” The government charges misbranding in two particulars. Eirst. Sulpho-napthol, as applied to an insecticide, means that the article so named is essentially either a composition of sulphur and napthol or a sulphur derivative of napthol. The product seized was neithér.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Libby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1913
  2. United States v. Thirty Dozen Packages of Roach FoodDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API