Legal Opinion

Napolitano v. F.S.P., Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 5, 2001No. 2000-CA-1602PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

| tLOVE, Judge.

Plaintiff, Jay M. Napolitano, and defendant, Scottsdale Insurance Company both appeal the trial court’s judgment awarding plaintiff damages totaling $175,000 for injury to his business caused by fire. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the trial court in respect to the damages awarded for loss on income because plaintiffs business was interrupted for a six-month period due to extensive fire and water damage. In contrast, we reverse the judgment of the trial court in its award on damages for loss of inconvenience because plaintiff was not present when the fire…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Mart v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  4. Moore v. Healthcare Elmwood, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. McDonald v. Illinois Cent. Gulf RR Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2009
  2. Ducombs v. Nobel Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API