Legal Opinion

People v. Holland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]; cf. People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]). The defendant’s valid waiver of appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentencing court should have considered and determined whether to sentence him as a youthful offender (see People v Billings, 60 AD3d 961, 962 [2009]; People v Valentin, 15 AD3d 424 [2005]; People v Friedlander, 11 AD3d 556 [2004]).

The ineffective assistance of counsel alleged by the defendant did not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. People v. BradshawNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. People v. SorinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. People v. BillingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. People v. ValentinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. DrammehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. FrankoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. People v. DrammehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. FrankoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API