Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. London

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1994No. 93-KA-387Published

1DissentI iBOWES, Judge

I disagree with the views expressed in the majority opinion. In my view, this matter *969should be remanded for an evidentiary hearing.

The record in this case reflects that this matter comes to us by virtue of a granting by the district court of an application for post-conviction relief which granted defendant an out-of-time appeal. However, the record does not disclose all of the evidence necessary to address appellant’s complaint.

The defendant’s plea may have been involuntarily entered if his allegations are true; however, there is an unresolved factual issue as to whether or not the district…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. LobatoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  3. State v. AubreyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Bouterie v. CraneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API