Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. City of Quincy

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Adams county; the Hon. B. F. Serbian, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Magruder

On June 19, 1889, the city council of the City of Quincy adopted an ordinance for the paving of Front Street between Broadway and Hampshire Streets, providing therein that the cost should be paid by special taxation upon the real estate contiguous to the improvement. The commissioners named in the ordinance made an estimate of the cost; their report of such estimate was approved by the city council; an order .was entered by the council directing the city attorney to file a petition in the county court for the assessment of the'cost of the improvement in accordance with Article IX of the “Act…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Quincy v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. City of Sterling v. GaltIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Middlesex Railroad v. WakefieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Village of Marseilles v. HowlandIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Dunham v. Village of Hyde ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Ganz v. Ohio Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
  3. McDaniel Bros. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. People ex rel. Whittock v. WillisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  5. City of Monroe v. Postal Telegraph Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API