Legal Opinion

Flores v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided December 14, 1994No. 07-93-0348-CR, 07-93-0349-CR, 07-93-0350-CR, 07-93-0351-CR, 07-93-0352-CRPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.

Charged by information with five separate Class A misdemeanor offenses of promotion of obscene material, appellant Ruben Flores pleaded nolo contendere, was found guilty in a bench trial, and was assessed punishment of five days in jail and a fine of $1500 for each offense. He contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to declare the obscenity statutes, upon which his prosecutions were based, unconstitutional as a limitation on free speech guaranteed by the Texas Constitution. We will affirm.

The obscenity offenses with which appellant was charged were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davenport v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Andrews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Southwick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  4. Abdnor v. OvardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. West v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Taulung v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
  2. Horton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
  3. Contreras v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
  4. Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  5. Amos, Kevin Monroe v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API