Legal Opinion

Strong v. New Hampshire Box Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 5, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

Laws 1911, c. 163, s. 4, provides that if the workman suffering an injury within the terms of the act “shall commence any action at common law . . . against the employer therefor, he shall be barred from all benefits of the act in regard thereto.” The record discloses that such an action was commenced and prosecuted to judgment. As the court had jurisdiction of the subject matter it is a sufficient answer to the plaintiff’s exception that this judgment is not open to collateral attack in these proceedings. State v. Kennedy, 65 N. H. 247; McKeen v. Converse, 68 N. H. 173, 176; Bickford v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WaterhouseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Barber v. GravesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846
  3. Millard v. MarmonIllinois Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. LaBonte v. National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  2. Williams v. BabcockSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  3. Hafey v. HafeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Paju Ex Rel. Paju v. RickerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  5. LaBonte v. National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API