Legal Opinion

Baranowitz v. Baranowitz

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalter R. Hart, J.

Defendant husband in May, 1953 brought an action for absolute divorce against plaintiff. The action was undefended and upon the hearing of the inquest before the Official Eeferee, counsel for the husband was directed to subpoena the wife. Accompanied by her attorney she appeared before the Official Eeferee on June 29, 1953, admitted she was served with process and advised the Eeferee that she did not desire to contest the action. On July 21, 1953 an interlocutory judgment of divorce was entered in favor of defendant husband which by its terms became final as of course three months later,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Hunt v. . HuntNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Bannon v. BannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Riggs v. . PursellNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Perkins v. Guaranty Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. George Williams v. Joe Sam OwenMississippi Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API