Legal Opinion

Hanes v. . Carolina Cadillac Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1918PublishedCited by 7 opinions

INJUNCTION pboceedino, beard by Lane, J., at September Term, 1918, of Foesyth. From tbe order made tbe plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

BeowN, J".

The plaintiff seeks to enjoin defendant until the final hearing of this cause from establishing a public supply station for automobiles on a lot near plaintiff’s residence property. The judge dissolved the temporary restraining order and refused an injunction to the hearing, but required defendant not to store over 1,500 gallons of gasoline in its 8,000-gallon tank at one time. "Whereupon defendant complied with the order and installed two 1,000-gallon tanks, instead of the 8,000-gallon tank. 'Defendant purposes to obey the order by storing 1,500 gallons in the two 1,000-gallon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Berger v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Harper v. Standard Oil Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1899

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Continental Oil Co. v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. KahnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  3. Wilson v. Evans Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Gillette v. TysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Wilcher v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API