Winkelman v. Furey
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs. The issue whether the Appellate Division properly affirmed Family Court’s award of counsel fees to respondent is now moot. The only issue before us is whether appellant’s request for sanctions below was properly denied. On this record, we cannot say as a matter of law that the denial of appellant’s request for sanctions was an abuse of discretion (see generally, Parks v Leahey & Johnson, 81 NY2d 161, 165 [1993]).
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Parks v. Leahey & Johnson, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by6 opinions
- Orner v. Mount Sinai HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Schmitt v. SchmittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Johnner v. MimsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Edelstein v. GreismanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Petosa v. PetosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.