Muckle v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
NAHMIAS, Justice.
Appellant Malcolm Muckle was convicted of felony murder in connection with the shooting death of Travis Callaway, his accomplice in an attempted armed robbery In this appeal, he claims that the *676evidence at his trial was insufficient to support his conviction and that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance. Neither of those claims has merit, so we affirm.1
1. Appellant first argues that the evidence presented at his trial was legally insufficient to support his conviction.(a) Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdicts, the evidence showed the following.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Malcolm v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Vega v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Bradshaw v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Frazier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- Lyons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- Cato v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
- Birdow v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.