Legal Opinion

Parks v. Crowley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 12, 1953No. 4-9932PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. Seaborn Holt, J.

This suit involves the custody of Pamela Crowley, a little girl about five and one-half years of age at the time of the trial. Appellant, Frances Parks (formerly Frances Crowley) is the natural mother of the child and appellees are its paternal grandparents. Jack Crowley, the child’s father, is not a party to this action. According to this record, he has never shown the slightest interest in Pamela and has never provided a home or any support for her. In fact, it clearly appears that he has, in general, proven a great disappointment to his parents (appellees) who reared him. On February 28,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baker v. DurhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Holmes v. ColemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  3. Washaw v. GimbleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  4. Loewe v. ShookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  5. Myers v. MyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cox v. StaytonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Quarles v. FrenchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Schuh v. RobersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Jones v. StrauserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Veazey v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API