White v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Appellant contends that the court should have given him credit for the period of time he was in custody pursuant to his commitment as a mentally disordered sex offender under Chapter 917. We agree. § 917.-014(1), Fla.Stat. (1979); See McGuirk v. State, 382 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).1
*787Accordingly, we affirm the judgment but remand the cause with directions that the court give appellant credit for the time he spent in the mentally disordered sex offender program.
HOBSON, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN and OTT, JJ., concur.. Section 917.014(2) had provided that “the provisions of this section shall…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McGuirk v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993