People v. Hoisington
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge RULAND.
Pursuant to § 16-12-102, C.R.S. (1994 Cum.Supp.), the prosecution appeals from the trial court’s order of restitution entered as part of defendant’s sentence to probation for second degree forgery. We affirm.
According to the plea agreement accepted by the trial court, defendant agreed to pay restitution to two different complainants in connection with a guilty plea to only one charge. The dispute here concerns the amount of restitution owed to one of the complainants, a printing company which employed defendant at the time of the offense.
At the sentencing hearing,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. DeadmondSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- People v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- People v. QuinonezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- People v. BorquezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- People v. AcostaColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. PaganColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. StaffordColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. SalasColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. DuranColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Commonwealth v. B.D.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.