Legal Opinion

Scott v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 7, 1988No. 88-313PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WENTWORTH, Judge.

Appellant sought mandamus in the lower court, contesting his presumptive parole release date. Jordan v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 423 So.2d 450 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), and the other cases upon which appellant relies were decided prior to the amendment of Rule 23-21.-011(3), F.A.C., which now expressly authorizes the aggregation of expired commitments without intervening periods of discharge. Appellant’s petition did not establish a basis for relief, and mandamus was properly denied.

We affirm the order appealed.

ERVIN and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jordan v. Florida Parole and Probation CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. FLA. PAROLE AND PROBATION COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Holloman v. Florida Parole & Probation CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994