Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 23, 2011No. 93, September Term, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

The Petitioners in this case—Steven Hill, Terri Alston, and Charles Yates 1 —were sentenced to terms of imprisonment with a deferred, or “springing,” start date. Under these sentences, their jail terms were scheduled to begin three to five years after the sentencing date. The sentencing judge informed Petitioners that if they stayed out of further legal trouble during that time, they could return to court before the start date and have their sentences vacated. Petitioners, however, did not return to court, and later failed to report on the respective start dates, and each was charged and pled…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. People v. LovercampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Diehl v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. Rodgers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rich v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Furda v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Rouse v. FlorioDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API