Superior Pine Products Co. v. United States

Pee Curiam :

These cases come before the court on plaintiff’s exceptions to a recommended decision filed April 6, 1972, by Trial Commissioner Roald A. Hogenson pursuant to Rule 184(h). The court has considered the case on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. Since the court agrees with the decision, as hereinafter set forth, it hereby affirms and adopts the same as the basis for its judgment in this case. Therefore, it is concluded that plaintiff is not entitled to recover on its claims and defendant is not entitled to recover on its counterclaim. Accordingly, plaintiff’s petitions and…