State v. Luchen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Christ Lucken was indicted by the grand jury of the crime of forgery in the second degree, tried in the district court for Chippewa county before Qvale, J., and a jury, and convicted. From an order denying his motion for a new trial on the ground of errors occurring at the trial and that the verdict was not justified by the evidence and from an order denying his motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Defendant was convicted of forging a bank check. Thereafter he moved for a new trial upon a settled case. The motion was denied hy an order filed in November, 1914. Subsequently he moved for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. This motion was also denied. Defendant appeals from both orders.
Between 6 and 8 o’clock on the evening of December 26, 1913, four spurious bank checks, each in an amount of near $20, purporting to be drawn by Peter W. Samdahl, upon the First National Bank of Montevideo, were presented to and cashed by four different business men in Montevideo,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Hickory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- People v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Commonwealth v. CoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. BockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Witters v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- State v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Ruben Hernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Porter v. Grennan Bakeries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.