Legal Opinion

Kaymore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 6, 1986No. 85-502PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Kaymore seeks reversal of his sentence which was a departure under the guidelines, thereby removing the sentence from parole consideration. The substantive offense occurred prior to the effective date of the guidelines and Kaymore did not affirmatively ask to be sentenced under the guidelines. Under these circumstances, we normally would reverse and remand for resentencing. Irving v. State, 464 So.2d 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Favors v. State, 473 So.2d 815 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). In this case, however, the record reveals that the trial court obviously would have imposed the maximum statutory…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Irving v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Tillman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Favors v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Hale v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API