Legal Opinion

Hanslik v. Nickels Ginning Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 11, 1973No. 8380PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Justice.

Venue resolved adverse to a plea of privilege asserted by the nonresident one of two defendants produced this appellate review. The evidence does not negate this defendant’s right to be sued in his domiciliary county. Reversed and transferred.

Appellee Nickels Ginning Company, a partnership, instituted suit against appellant Adolph Hanslik, a resident of Lubbock County, and M. K. Dean, a resident of Bailey County, seeking damages for the defendants’ failure to pay for cotton purchased from appellee. The allegations are that appellee sold and delivered cotton in Bailey County…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stockyards National Bank v. MaplesTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Texas Co. v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Sampson v. Apco Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. White v. Matador Land & Cattle Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  5. Hudson v. Compere Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Angelo v. Chemical Bank and Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Helland v. WESTERN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. First State Bank of Childress v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Chilton Corporation v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Los Fresnos Consolidated Independent School District and Michael L. Williams, Commissioner of Education v. Jorge Vazquez, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API