Johnson v. Bindsell
New York Court of Common Pleas
On motion for reargument, or for leave to go to court of appeals. Action on contract by Moses M. Johnson against Herman F. Bindsell. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff’s motion for reargument or leave to go to court of appeals denied. For former report, see 8 H. Y. Supp. 485.
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Ctjeiam.
This case was decided at the January general term of this court, and the judgment affirmed. The plaintiff’s counsel now claims that, on the argument of this case, Doll v. Noble, 116 N. Y. 231, 22 N. E. Rep. 406, was not then reported, and consequently was not brought to the attention of the court, and that this ease is decisive of the questions involved in this. We think not, for in this case the contract was as follows: “New York, January 8, 1889. I, Moses Johnson, agree to teach .Herman F. Bindsell the art of draughting patterns by scale, and in every particular and branch of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Thomas v. . FleuryNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crawford v. . Mail Express Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Glyn v. MinerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
- Weaver v. KlawCity of New York Municipal Court · 1891