Legal Opinion

United States v. Lanoie

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 24, 2010No. 10-2125UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Paul Lanoie Jr. proceeding pro se, appeals an order of the district court ordering him to provide the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) with information sought in a summons issued by the IRS, as well as a separate judgment enforcing the summons against him. We…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Arthur Young & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Lonsdale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. EugeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. WankelDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API