Rushton v. State

OPINION

BENAVIDES, Justice.

Appellant was found guilty by a jury of the offense of burglary of a habitation with the intent to commit rape. The jury further found that appellant had previously been convicted of a felony, and assessed a punishment of thirty-five years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. We affirm.

Appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, therefore, no detailed recitation of the facts is necessary.

In his first ground of error, appellant alleges the court erred in admitting State’s exhibits two and three. In his…