State v. F. E. J.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
COWART, Judge.
The juvenile court judge found that appellee, a child, was given Miranda warnings and that the child was of sufficient age and intelligence to comprehend his circumstances and such rights. Nevertheless, the judge granted a motion to suppress the child’s statement because (1) no inquiry was made by the police officers as to the child’s actual comprehension of his Miranda rights, (2) the child was taken into custody and to the police department for questioning for approximately one hour rather than being taken directly to a detention or crisis home (see § 39.03(3), Fla.Stat.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Doerr v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- T. B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Interest of R. J. B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- State v. ClarkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rubasky v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Lightsey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- A.L.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985