Legal Opinion

State v. Rizzo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 10, 1981No. 80-1604PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BOARDMAN, Judge.

The state appeals the trial court’s order granting appellee’s motion to suppress evidence. The order was predicated on a finding that the initial stop of appellee’s vehicle was unjustified.

The only witness who testified at the hearing, Officer Hauck, testified that he was sent to the Coats’ residence on Shore Drive to investigate a burglary that had taken place a few days earlier. The victims told Hauck that on their way home that evening they had seen the same car leaving their neighborhood that they had observed the night of the burglary. They described the vehicle as a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hetland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. State v. HetlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  3. Lachs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. C. F. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rizzo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API