Feeley v. Wurster
New York Supreme Court
Ok demurrer to the complaint, the facts, so far as necessary for consideration, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMaddox, J.
By this action plaintiff, a taxpayer, seeks a judgment of this court, declaring certain hills, claims and accounts, set forth in, and copies of which are annexed to, the complaint, to he false, fraudulent, illegal, excessive, unjust and inequitable; the audit and approval thereof by the defendants to be illegal and void; that the individual defendants restore the amount thereof, with *545interest, to the city of Brooklyn, or its successor, the city of New York, and that the city of Hew York have judgment therefor against the individual defendants.
The defendant Wurster demurs to the complaint upon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chittenden v. . WursterNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Coatsworth v. Lehigh Valley Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
- The People Ex Rel. Negus v. . DwyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Masterson v. . TownshendNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Bruce v. . BurrNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jaeger v. KoenigAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1900