Goforth v. State

HAWKINS, Judge.

The conviction is for manufacturing intoxicating liquor, punishment being one year in the penitentiary.

There is no merit in the contention that the indictment should have been quashed because the State law is in conflict with the Federal Constitution and Acts of Congress. Ex parte Gilmore, 88 Texas Crim. Rep., 529, 228 S. W. Rep., 199. The same question has been decided some thirty or more times by this court following Gilmore’s case, and by the Supreme Court of the United States in Chandler v. State of Texas, reported in 67 Law. Ed., 475; also in Vigliotti v. Pennsylvania, 258…