Ross v. Quick
Mississippi Supreme Court
From the chancery court of Jones county. Hon. James L. McOaskill, Chancellor. Ross and others, appellants, Were complainants in the Gourt below; Quick and others, the appellees, were defendants there. From a decree dissolving the injunction, awarding damages against the complainants and dismissing the suit, the complainants appealed to the supreme court.
Read the full summary
From the chancery court of Jones county. Hon. James L. McOaskill, Chancellor. Ross and others, appellants, Were complainants in the Gourt below; Quick and others, the appellees, were defendants there. From a decree dissolving the injunction, awarding damages against the complainants and dismissing the suit, the complainants appealed to the supreme court. The suit was by resident citizens of Jones county against the board of election commissioners and board of supervisors of said county, seeking to restrain them from putting into operation an act of the legislature (Laws 1906,,ch. 169, p.…
1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, C. J.
The motion to discharge supersedeas in this case is hereby sustained, in so far as it supersedes the dissolution of the injunction enjoining the election commissioners of Jones county from holding the said election, from appointing managers and clerks to *32bold said election, from reporting and returning said election to tbe board of supervisors, and from proceeding any further toward ordering and bolding said election, and in so far as it supersedes tbe dissolution of tbe injunction enjoining tbe board of supervisors of Jones county from receiving tbe reports and returns of said election from…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Carter v. Harrison County Election CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
- Bush v. QuickMississippi Supreme Court · 1907
- Rush v. PearsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1907