Legal Opinion

Metropolitan L. Co., Ltd. v. Greenfield

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1937No. Civ. 10347PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Appeal from an order granting a temporary injunction. The action in which the relief was prayed for and granted was one for damages. The allegations are to' the effect that defendant Greenfield was employed by plaintiff as a laundry driver to collect from and deliver to customers of plaintiff certain laundry work; that at the time Greenfield entered upon his employment he agreed in writing that while in the employment of plaintiff, or thereafter should such employment be terminated, he would not solicit, divert or take away or furnish to any person, for a period of one year after the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. De Godey v. GodeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Lutz v. Western Iron & Metal Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Crandall v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Gagliardo v. CrippenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Pavilion Ice Rink v. O'BrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. Black's Food StoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Monterey Club v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. City and County of San Francisco v. EvankovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Remillard Brick Co. v. DandiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Garner v. Journeyman Barbers' Etc. UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API