Legal Opinion
Hill v. Brown
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided July 15, 1996No. 94-1009PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEINBERG, Judge:
On this appeal to the Court from a July 1, 1994, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) decision, the matter for the Court to decide initially is whether the appellant has filed a timely Notice of Appeal (NOA). The parties have filed pleadings, and two amicus curiae briefs and one amicus memorandum have been submitted. For the reasons that follow, the Court will hold that the NOA was not timely filed and will dismiss the appeal.
I. Background
The pro se appellant, veteran Johnny E. Hill, filed a November 5, 1994, NOA from a July 1,1994, BVA decision.' Hence, his NOA was received 127…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rosler v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Lyle H. Prenzler v. Edward J. Derwinski, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Ashley v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Skinner v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hilkert v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
- Perez v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996
- Paniag v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
- Leonard v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
- Reich v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.