Bruce v. Hubbell
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Starke Circuit Court; W. G. Pentecost, J udge. Action by Milo M. Bruce and another against Mary E. Hubbell and others. From the judgment rendered, the plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, P. J.
This action is to recover a balance due appellants as attorneys for professional services rendered by them for appellee Mary E. Hubbell, in a suit by her for divorce against appellee Lewis W. Hubbell, and to enforce the collection of a note executed by appellees Lewis W. Hubbell and Joseph L. Beesley to appellee Mary E. Hubbell, in the sum of $500, which note, it is alleged, was assigned and delivered by said Mary E. Hubbell, without indorsement, to appellants as collateral security for the balance due them as aforesaid, and out of the proceeds of which said note appellants seek to enforce…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parker v. HubbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Todd v. FentonIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Wysong v. NealisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Maxwell v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Taylor v. BurkIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Haywood v. Swift & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
- GROSSMAN v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
- Sangster v. Van HeckeIllinois Supreme Court · 1977