Legal Opinion

Kerns v. Kerns

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 9, 1984No. 1016, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLOOM, Judge.

The present appeal requires us to address a heretofore unanswered question, i.e., does a chancellor in a contested child custody proceeding have the authority to award joint custody of the children to both parents? We conclude that a chancellor does have such authority. We also conclude that the chancellor in the instant case did not abuse his discretion in making such an award.

Karen Lea Kerns, appellant, and Eugene J. Kerns, Jr., appellee, were married on December 5, 1970. Their marriage produced two children, Michael Joseph, born on June 13, 1971, and Kristina Marie, born on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Krebs v. KrebsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Winter v. Crowley, Jr.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  4. Maddox v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  5. McCann v. McCannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Frase v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Skeens v. PaternoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Hill v. HillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Santo v. SantoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API