Legal Opinion

McPeters v. . Ray

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1881PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Civil-Action tried at Spring Term, 1881, of Yancey Superior Court, before McKoy, J. Judgment for plaintiff, appeal by the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

This action is for an-adjustment of the affairs of an alleged co-partnership in the purchase and sale of mica, and for a claim for personal services rendered outside the joint business. The defendant in his first answer denies the existence of a partnership for any purpose and his liability to any demand of the plaintiff, but in his subsequent amendment admits a restricted co-partnership between themselves and C. F. Young in buying and disposing of, for their common benefit, a single lot of that material obtained from one McWm; Young in the year 1876.

Upon the trial of the cause at spring…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. . KilburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  2. Chester & Lenoir Railroad v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  3. Schehan v. . MaloneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Osmers v. FureyMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Grant v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  3. Boggan v. . HorneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. Wilson v. . ScarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Commissioners of Wake v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API