Legal Opinion

Orrick v. Durham

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Appeal from Moberly Court of Common Pleas. — TIon. G-. H. Burckhartt, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Philips, C.

In February, 1872, the appellant, Orrick, purchased of D. P. Shaw a tract of land in Randolph county, receiving therefor a warranty deed, duly recorded in said county. As a part of the purchase money Orrick executed to Shaw two promissory notes, each for $333.33, of same date as deed, due in one and two years, respectively; and to secure the same executed a deed of trust to H. M. Porter, trustee, on same land. In June following, Orrick sold and conveyed this land to one J. B. Porter for the consideration of $2,675. Ms a part payment of this purchase money, J. B. Porter agreed with…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fish v. HowlandNew York Court of Chancery · 1828
  2. Halsey v. ReedNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
  3. Johnson v. . ZinkNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Logan v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  5. Emison v. WhittleseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Hope v. BlairSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Gholson v. SavinOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Pratt v. ConwaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. Nelson v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  5. Reyburn v. MitchellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API