Legal Opinion

Malcolm v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Racine

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

1. Robert Malcolm’s claim. Paragraph Fifth, on its face, provides for a gift to Malcolm only upon the contingency that neither Mrs. McDowell nor Jerome survive the testator, and Jerome die without issue. Since both did survive, the contingency did not occur, and paragraph Fifth, according to its terms, never became operative.

Malcolm, however, argues that the intention of Mr. McDowell to benefit Malcolm in preference to all others except Mrs. McDowell, during her life, Jerome, and Jerome’s issue, is so clear that paragraph Fifth implies a gift to Malcolm on the contingency which did occur,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Donges's EstateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. O'Hearn v. O'HearnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Lawrence v. BarberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Salvesen v. CordesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Schneider v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MacLean v. First National Bank of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Trust Created Under the Last Will & Testament of Pauly v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. McElligott v. MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. McElligott v. MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API