Malcolm v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Racine
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
1. Robert Malcolm’s claim. Paragraph Fifth, on its face, provides for a gift to Malcolm only upon the contingency that neither Mrs. McDowell nor Jerome survive the testator, and Jerome die without issue. Since both did survive, the contingency did not occur, and paragraph Fifth, according to its terms, never became operative.
Malcolm, however, argues that the intention of Mr. McDowell to benefit Malcolm in preference to all others except Mrs. McDowell, during her life, Jerome, and Jerome’s issue, is so clear that paragraph Fifth implies a gift to Malcolm on the contingency which did occur,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re Donges's EstateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- O'Hearn v. O'HearnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Lawrence v. BarberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Salvesen v. CordesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Schneider v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by4 opinions
- MacLean v. First National Bank of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Trust Created Under the Last Will & Testament of Pauly v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- McElligott v. MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- McElligott v. MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974