Hendler v. United States
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Apart from the literal meaning of the section, the assumption of liabilities in this case was not within the substantial import of the statute. In financial substance Hendler merely exchanged its equity in its property for shares of stock in the Borden Company which represented only the equity therein, and which pro tanto were diminished in value by the Hendler liabilities assumed by Borden. Neither in form nor substance did Hendler receive any “other property or money” by Borden’s assumption of Hendler’s liabilities.
Counsel for the Government also contends the item of $534,297.40, even if…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- United States v. Kirby Lumber CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. PhellisSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Pinellas Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. HendlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Focht v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
- González Padín Co. v. Tribunal de Contribuciones de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
- Focht v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
- González Padín Co. v. Tax Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947