Legal Opinion

White v. Fox

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 6, 2008No. 05-41387UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: **

Plaintiff-Appellant William Dexter White (“White”), a Texas state prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against several Texas prison officials. White alleges that the prison disciplinary proceeding did not satisfy the minimum requirements of proce dural due process. The district court applied Supreme Court precedent and held that White’s claims were not cognizable under § 1988. Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641, 117 S.Ct. 1584, 137 L.Ed.2d 906 (1997). Because we cannot say that all of White’s § 1983 claims…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. MizzelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. William White v. Ronald FoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  3. Cynthia Johnson v. Narissa Mohammed and Nicholas Mohammed, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  4. Fleming v. GalipeauDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
  5. Gerald Allen Perry v. Gene A. Kroll, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API