Legal Opinion

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 28, 1987No. 85-3201PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Linn

Following a bench trial, defendant, Frank Ortiz, was convicted of armed robbery and sentenced to 12 years in prison. On appeal, he contends that: (1) he was not proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt because the State failed to establish the elements of armed robbery; (2) he was not proved guilty of armed robbery beyond a reasonable doubt because the trial court acquitted him of burglary with the intent to commit armed robbery on his motion for directed finding but found him guilty of armed robbery at the end of the trial; (3) he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel when…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. La PointeIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. KrankelIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. The People v. AdkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  4. People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. FriasIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. DennisIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. BlakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. ColleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. People v. SolisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. People v. TenninAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API