Freedman v. Oppenheim
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Action by Betsie Freedman and another against William Oppenheim. From a judgment directing the specific performance by the defendant of a contract for the exchange of real property, defendant appeals. Reversed.
1Per curiam
Upon the proof offered on the first trial of this action, the title to the property which the plaintiffs undertook to convey to the defendant was declared by this court to be such as a purchaser should not be compelled to accept. Freedman v. Oppenheim, 80 App. Div. 487, 81 N. Y. Supp. 110. Upon the second trial, which now comes up for review, the plaintiffs attempted to strengthen their proof of adverse possession in accordance with the suggestion of the *879presiding justice in his opinion upon the first appeal. The additional proof submitted for this purpose does not seem to us sufficient to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Freedman v. OppenheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903