Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tluchak Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1949No. Appeals, 5 and 6PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Beño, J.,

Appellants, husband and wife, separately appealed from convictions for larceny. The court below overruled their motions for new trials and arrest of judgment. The husband was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and make restitution. Sentence was suspended in the wife’s case.

The case arose out of a real estate transaction. By a written instrument appellants agreed to sell their farm to the prosecutor and his wife. The agreement did not include any personal property but it did cover: “All buildings, plumbing, heating, lighting fixtures, screens, storm sash, shades, blinds,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TrunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Commonwealth v. RagoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Commonwealth v. EichelbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. Commonwealth v. QuinnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Henwood & Arney v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. FoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Commonwealth v. WadleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. DeAngelis Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Commonwealth v. HeintzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API