Green v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice.
Ronald R. Green appeals his conviction for aggravated sexual assault. He seeks to overturn it by contending that 1) the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to sustain it, 2) the trial court erred in refusing to grant his objection to the prosecutor’s wearing of a religious cross on her person, and 3) the trial court erred in granting the State’s motion to invoke the rule against his “parents.” We affirm the judgment.
Issues 1 and 2 — Sufficiency of the Evidence
In his first two issues, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Zuliani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Zorach v. ClausonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Villalon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alexander v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
- Adolfo Turcios v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2013
- Detwonne Monshay Alexander v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
- Detwonne Monshay Alexander v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
- Edwin Andrew DeGraff v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.